For Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails, hunger strikes have become a fixture of prison life. The frequency of hunger strikes is a testament to prisoners' desperation. They would rather risk death by refusing to eat than accept their abysmal treatment: solitary confinement, humiliating strip-searches, sleep deprivation and beatings.

Hundreds of Palestinian prisoners are held in 'administrative detention' – without being charged or even being told what crimes they are believed to have committed. They are denied a full range of basic rights – from family visits to due legal process.  For these prisoners, hunger strikes are virtually the only way they have to fight back.

Hunger strikes have a long tradition in non-violent resistance movements. People fast as an act of political protest, to raise awareness about their plight, or challenge their oppressors. Mahatma Gandhi engaged in several hunger strikes to protest British rule of India. Imprisoned members of the Provisional Irish Republican Army also used hunger strikes to pressure their jailers to release them.

The success of a hunger strike depends on three factors: media attention, support from the public and – perhaps most crucially – the striker's determination. For anyone engaging in a hunger strike, there is a very real risk that their act of protest will be their final one. A person's health rapidly declines without food; after two weeks, the body starts to dissolve tissue to stay alive, while after two months, there is the risk of death from heart failure.

Palestinian prisoners have staged dozens of hunger strikes since the Israeli occupation began. In some cases, these strikes have ended with prisoners having their basic demands met. However, in many instances, the prisoners' victories have been temporary, and their suffering is ongoing. 'Administrative detention' and arbitrary arrests continue in the OPT, and so Palestinian prisoners also continue to plan more hunger strikes.